<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for graphility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graphility.com/wp-commentsrss2.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graphility.com</link>
	<description>agile graphic development</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Photographic self-assessment by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952798/</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/343#comment-687</guid>
		<description>I couldn't understand some parts of this article Photographic self-assessment, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article Photographic self-assessment, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952798" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/12/04/photographic-self-assessment/#comment-687</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is more to web design - part 1 by Hiddenson’s Construct | Graphic Art Design</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952799/</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiddenson’s Construct | Graphic Art Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/344#comment-688</guid>
		<description>[...] Today’s web hype is grossly divided in two: Flash and web 2.0. Both concepts are extremely powerful when used properly, but fact is that many websites use Flash for no other reason than animating content, or web 2.0 cosmetics just to adhere to the norm. Unfortunately, even some graphic design magazines help spreading this trend by promoting Flash websites as the “best of the web”. Would this mean that a website with no animation and no bubble gum icons is doomed? Not quite. Just as in part 1 of this series where the tools were not the end, but the means, the most important principle of a website is not its presentation, but its content. Sound, movies, and instant chat may sound cool to you on paper, but they may be pointless and even annoying for your audience if the long run. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today&#8217;s web hype is grossly divided in two: Flash and web 2.0. Both concepts are extremely powerful when used properly, but fact is that many websites use Flash for no other reason than animating content, or web 2.0 cosmetics just to adhere to the norm. Unfortunately, even some graphic design magazines help spreading this trend by promoting Flash websites as the &#8220;best of the web&#8221;. Would this mean that a website with no animation and no bubble gum icons is doomed? Not quite. Just as in part 1 of this series where the tools were not the end, but the means, the most important principle of a website is not its presentation, but its content. Sound, movies, and instant chat may sound cool to you on paper, but they may be pointless and even annoying for your audience if the long run. [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952799" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2008/01/05/there-is-more-to-web-design/#comment-688</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a masterpiece? by judekyle</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952800/</link>
		<dc:creator>judekyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/324#comment-671</guid>
		<description>It's a fairly easy definition to make, and it certainly applies to Shakespeare or Moliere, both of whom I am sure we can all agree created many masterpieces (I will focus on lit since that is my bag), but it could just as easily apply to other works that I personally wouldn't consider masterpieces. I think it is safe to say that a few of the novels of Stephen King and Danielle Steele will, over the test of time, meet these criteria, but does that actually mean that they should be considered literature or artistic masterpieces? I'm not convinced. Yet.

If I think about it in the other direction, taking Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities and Tolstoy's Anna Karenina (which I cut some slack since I have never read it in Russian), I am even less convinced. Both of these novels belong to the canon. I think both of them are unworthy of their status and their places as great art. I imagine that for most readers they meet your professor's criteria for greatness, and they certainly seem to have even lasted the test of time, but they are both deeply flawed for me personally. Both of them need to be edited and cut to improve their readability. I find the former politically appalling, and I think the narrator  is a painful reminder of how the "moral majority" thinks and continues to think -- thus I hate it. I find the latter stultifying in its characterizations, and I wanted everyone, not just Anna, to kill themselves by the last page -- thus I hate it.

So all of this to say, I suppose, that the ultimate arbiter for each of us is ourselves. Just because the vast majority see something as art means nothing. The vast majority have no taste.

One last parting thought: those who argue that no one man named Shakespeare could have written everything he wrote are fools (although I do still think it is possible that Shakespeare was someone else). We often miss the fact that Shakespeare, in his time, was a bit of a hack. He wrote for the masses, and while he occasionally injected his work with serious gravity, he lasted because he was popular first and appreciated artistically later. We will see the same future honoring of Michael Crichton and other popular writers of today, while it is entirely possible that the David Mitchell's and China Mieville's of the world will be forgotten outside of their own loyal circles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fairly easy definition to make, and it certainly applies to Shakespeare or Moliere, both of whom I am sure we can all agree created many masterpieces (I will focus on lit since that is my bag), but it could just as easily apply to other works that I personally wouldn&#8217;t consider masterpieces. I think it is safe to say that a few of the novels of Stephen King and Danielle Steele will, over the test of time, meet these criteria, but does that actually mean that they should be considered literature or artistic masterpieces? I&#8217;m not convinced. Yet.</p>
<p>If I think about it in the other direction, taking Dickens&#8217; A Tale of Two Cities and Tolstoy&#8217;s Anna Karenina (which I cut some slack since I have never read it in Russian), I am even less convinced. Both of these novels belong to the canon. I think both of them are unworthy of their status and their places as great art. I imagine that for most readers they meet your professor&#8217;s criteria for greatness, and they certainly seem to have even lasted the test of time, but they are both deeply flawed for me personally. Both of them need to be edited and cut to improve their readability. I find the former politically appalling, and I think the narrator  is a painful reminder of how the &#8220;moral majority&#8221; thinks and continues to think &#8212; thus I hate it. I find the latter stultifying in its characterizations, and I wanted everyone, not just Anna, to kill themselves by the last page &#8212; thus I hate it.</p>
<p>So all of this to say, I suppose, that the ultimate arbiter for each of us is ourselves. Just because the vast majority see something as art means nothing. The vast majority have no taste.</p>
<p>One last parting thought: those who argue that no one man named Shakespeare could have written everything he wrote are fools (although I do still think it is possible that Shakespeare was someone else). We often miss the fact that Shakespeare, in his time, was a bit of a hack. He wrote for the masses, and while he occasionally injected his work with serious gravity, he lasted because he was popular first and appreciated artistically later. We will see the same future honoring of Michael Crichton and other popular writers of today, while it is entirely possible that the David Mitchell&#8217;s and China Mieville&#8217;s of the world will be forgotten outside of their own loyal circles.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952800" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/02/26/what-is-a-masterpiece/#comment-671</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which browser for the Mac? by Hiddenson</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952801/</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiddenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/340#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Hey tipograf, and welcome to my Construct!

About the "three computers": yes, I knew this. Being able to install these three operating systems into a single machine was perhaps the major reason to make the move. I plan to use OS X for all my design purposes, and keep windows for the odd development and game session.

I started trying Camino after writing this construction, and while I enjoy it so far, I agree that Firefox seems way more powerful. Camino seems faster, which I guess is the advantage of being a light-weight application.

Safari sucks, plainly. The browsing is slower and I feel it does not respect web standards as well as others. My site does not display exactly as I want on Safari, while Camino displays it right.

Thanks you very much for your expertise and for letting me know about the other browser, I'll have a peek at it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey tipograf, and welcome to my Construct!</p>
<p>About the &#8220;three computers&#8221;: yes, I knew this. Being able to install these three operating systems into a single machine was perhaps the major reason to make the move. I plan to use OS X for all my design purposes, and keep windows for the odd development and game session.</p>
<p>I started trying Camino after writing this construction, and while I enjoy it so far, I agree that Firefox seems way more powerful. Camino seems faster, which I guess is the advantage of being a light-weight application.</p>
<p>Safari sucks, plainly. The browsing is slower and I feel it does not respect web standards as well as others. My site does not display exactly as I want on Safari, while Camino displays it right.</p>
<p>Thanks you very much for your expertise and for letting me know about the other browser, I&#8217;ll have a peek at it!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952801" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/10/15/which-browser-for-the-mac/#comment-686</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which browser for the Mac? by tipograf</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952802/</link>
		<dc:creator>tipograf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/340#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Hi Hector,

First, congratulations for switching to mac:-) hope You'll enjoy it:-)

- Maybe You know, You have bouht three computers. First of course, with Mac OS X. If You want, You can try the Bootcamp (http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/bootcamp.html) and You have a shiny PC with windows.

- Or, If You miss the Linux, of course, can install on it: http://www.mactel-linux.org/wiki/HOWTO

As I read your demands, maybe the Firefox will be the optimal solution for You. This browser is compliant with all web standards, extensible, popup blocker. If it's not enough fast, You can try the optimized builds from here: http://www.furbism.com/firefoxmac/ It's shame, but I don't have Safari on my Mac:-) I use Firefox.
If you are a web developer, this small browser will be very useful: http://www.sunrisebrowser.com/en/

Greetings from Hungary:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hector,</p>
<p>First, congratulations for switching to mac:-) hope You&#8217;ll enjoy it:-)</p>
<p>- Maybe You know, You have bouht three computers. First of course, with Mac OS X. If You want, You can try the Bootcamp (http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/bootcamp.html) and You have a shiny PC with windows.</p>
<p>- Or, If You miss the Linux, of course, can install on it: <a href="http://www.mactel-linux.org/wiki/HOWTO" rel="nofollow">http://www.mactel-linux.org/wiki/HOWTO</a></p>
<p>As I read your demands, maybe the Firefox will be the optimal solution for You. This browser is compliant with all web standards, extensible, popup blocker. If it&#8217;s not enough fast, You can try the optimized builds from here: <a href="http://www.furbism.com/firefoxmac/" rel="nofollow">http://www.furbism.com/firefoxmac/</a> It&#8217;s shame, but I don&#8217;t have Safari on my Mac:-) I use Firefox.<br />
If you are a web developer, this small browser will be very useful: <a href="http://www.sunrisebrowser.com/en/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sunrisebrowser.com/en/</a></p>
<p>Greetings from Hungary:-)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952802" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/10/15/which-browser-for-the-mac/#comment-685</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interior design by Hiddenson</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952803/</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiddenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/323#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your nice comment, I am glad you enjoyed the works I display through Flickr!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your nice comment, I am glad you enjoyed the works I display through Flickr!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952803" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/02/05/interior-design/#comment-669</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interior design by Nuwan</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952804/</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/323#comment-668</guid>
		<description>Hi, I am Nuwan. I am from Sri Lanka. I like ur creations. Actually it is nice. Interior Design is one of my ffffffffffavourite subject in my dream world. I saw ur pics through Flickr.

Nuwan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am Nuwan. I am from Sri Lanka. I like ur creations. Actually it is nice. Interior Design is one of my ffffffffffavourite subject in my dream world. I saw ur pics through Flickr.</p>
<p>Nuwan.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952804" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/02/05/interior-design/#comment-668</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on (G8 + 5) - 8 by Hiddenson</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952805/</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiddenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/334#comment-684</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://liege.indymedia.org/news/2007/06/16779.php" title="Prison break" rel="tag" rel="nofollow"&gt;Inside story of a Belgian arrested at Rostock&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liege.indymedia.org/news/2007/06/16779.php" title="Prison break" rel="tag" rel="nofollow">Inside story of a Belgian arrested at Rostock</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952805" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/05/30/g8-5-8/#comment-684</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on (G8 + 5) - 8 by Hiddenson</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952806/</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiddenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/334#comment-683</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://acontrecourant.be/1898.html" title="A contre courant" rel="tag" rel="nofollow"&gt;Follow-up on the demonstrations at the G8 summit&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://acontrecourant.be/1898.html" title="A contre courant" rel="tag" rel="nofollow">Follow-up on the demonstrations at the G8 summit</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952806" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/05/30/g8-5-8/#comment-683</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on (G8 + 5) - 8 by Vincent</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~3/478952807/</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 08:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphility.com/hiddenson/archives/334#comment-682</guid>
		<description>signed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>signed</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/graphilitycomments/~4/478952807" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.graphility.com/2007/05/30/g8-5-8/#comment-682</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
